Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tithe"
From benscondo.wiki-rpg.com
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Brandon|Brandon]] 13:12, 29 July 2008 (MST) Hmmmmm, pretty cool. I'm still kinda partial to [http://www.wowwiki.com/Image:Spellbreaker.jpg this], minus the stupid two-sided sword (anyone who thinks those are cool doesn't understand how swords work). But, either way, these badass pictures are aspirational. At the moment, all I have is a not-too-cool shield and skivvies. No cool armor or flowing robes or anything. | --[[User:Brandon|Brandon]] 13:12, 29 July 2008 (MST) Hmmmmm, pretty cool. I'm still kinda partial to [http://www.wowwiki.com/Image:Spellbreaker.jpg this], minus the stupid two-sided sword (anyone who thinks those are cool doesn't understand how swords work). But, either way, these badass pictures are aspirational. At the moment, all I have is a not-too-cool shield and skivvies. No cool armor or flowing robes or anything. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''GABE:''' More blades = less gay | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 29 July 2008
The stone elf social limitation is that they may have no permanent settlements. In addition, stone elves have a very strong sense of the "guest right", because what camps they do have have a great deal of significance to them.
GABE: Your elf, cept with sword? http://www.privateerpress.com/WARMACHINE/gallery/default.php?level=picture&id=249
--Brandon 13:12, 29 July 2008 (MST) Hmmmmm, pretty cool. I'm still kinda partial to this, minus the stupid two-sided sword (anyone who thinks those are cool doesn't understand how swords work). But, either way, these badass pictures are aspirational. At the moment, all I have is a not-too-cool shield and skivvies. No cool armor or flowing robes or anything.
GABE: More blades = less gay
