Difference between revisions of "Talk:Character classes"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''GABE:''' Heh heh, no problem. I may start with the crimes disaddy then. I was thinking about it anyway. | '''GABE:''' Heh heh, no problem. I may start with the crimes disaddy then. I was thinking about it anyway. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Brandon|Brandon]] 19:38, 4 August 2008 (MST) The Paladin class looks basically exactly like what I envisioned for my character, and how I was going to roleplay it anyway. That being said, I'm not sure what having character classes adds to the game. I was kind of excited about the lack thereof, but am not terribly worried. I just don't see the need to have them. | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 4 August 2008
GABE: Sneaky types?
Oh yeah. Duh. If you want to go that route, you will have to "double class", since as an alchemist you fall into the "Witch" class already. I'll come up with some sort of mechanic for that, but it will probably mean taking the disads of both but only a mix (of your choice) of the advantages.
GABE: Heh heh, no problem. I may start with the crimes disaddy then. I was thinking about it anyway.
--Brandon 19:38, 4 August 2008 (MST) The Paladin class looks basically exactly like what I envisioned for my character, and how I was going to roleplay it anyway. That being said, I'm not sure what having character classes adds to the game. I was kind of excited about the lack thereof, but am not terribly worried. I just don't see the need to have them.
