Difference between revisions of "Talk:No Sudden Victory-TI"
From benscondo.wiki-rpg.com
m |
(→Victory Conditions) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 16:56, 24 May 2012 (MST) Agreed.<br> | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 16:56, 24 May 2012 (MST) Agreed.<br> | ||
So are there, like, 4 Public Objectives (Combat, Control, Achievement, Spending) that can be claimed each Status Phase and then a stack of Secret Objectives that slowly become public as game play & Bureaucracy card allow? First one to 60 wins? | So are there, like, 4 Public Objectives (Combat, Control, Achievement, Spending) that can be claimed each Status Phase and then a stack of Secret Objectives that slowly become public as game play & Bureaucracy card allow? First one to 60 wins? | ||
| + | --[[User:Jason|Jason]] 17:07, 24 May 2012 (MST)What I am trying to figure out is whether or not we make a standard victory deck as well. Nowhere does it say we dont, so I think we do. Thoughts? | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 24 May 2012
Victory Conditions
I dislike the voting for who wins portion of this. If it is a tie, I think the winner should revert to lowest strategy card, which is the de facto tie breaker in TI as written.
--Dieter the Bold 16:56, 24 May 2012 (MST) Agreed.
So are there, like, 4 Public Objectives (Combat, Control, Achievement, Spending) that can be claimed each Status Phase and then a stack of Secret Objectives that slowly become public as game play & Bureaucracy card allow? First one to 60 wins?
--Jason 17:07, 24 May 2012 (MST)What I am trying to figure out is whether or not we make a standard victory deck as well. Nowhere does it say we dont, so I think we do. Thoughts?
