Difference between revisions of "Talk:No Sudden Victory-TI"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Victory Conditions= | =Victory Conditions= | ||
I dislike the voting for who wins portion of this. If it is a tie, I think the winner should revert to lowest strategy card, which is the de facto tie breaker in TI as written. | I dislike the voting for who wins portion of this. If it is a tie, I think the winner should revert to lowest strategy card, which is the de facto tie breaker in TI as written. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 16:56, 24 May 2012 (MST) Agreed.<br> | ||
| + | So are there, like, 4 Public Objectives (Combat, Control, Achievement, Spending) that can be claimed each Status Phase and then a stack of Secret Objectives that slowly become public as game play & Bureaucracy card allow? First one to 60 wins?<br> | ||
| + | --[[User:Jason|Jason]] 17:07, 24 May 2012 (MST)What I am trying to figure out is whether or not we make a standard victory deck as well. Nowhere does it say we don't, so I think we do. Thoughts?<br> | ||
| + | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 17:26, 24 May 2012 (MST) I'd assume not, given how quickly we can score points.<br> | ||
| + | --[[User:Jason|Jason]] 17:59, 24 May 2012 (MST)After looking through their page I see their scoring and they do not have other objectives. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:59, 24 May 2012
Victory Conditions
I dislike the voting for who wins portion of this. If it is a tie, I think the winner should revert to lowest strategy card, which is the de facto tie breaker in TI as written.
--Dieter the Bold 16:56, 24 May 2012 (MST) Agreed.
So are there, like, 4 Public Objectives (Combat, Control, Achievement, Spending) that can be claimed each Status Phase and then a stack of Secret Objectives that slowly become public as game play & Bureaucracy card allow? First one to 60 wins?
--Jason 17:07, 24 May 2012 (MST)What I am trying to figure out is whether or not we make a standard victory deck as well. Nowhere does it say we don't, so I think we do. Thoughts?
--Dieter the Bold 17:26, 24 May 2012 (MST) I'd assume not, given how quickly we can score points.
--Jason 17:59, 24 May 2012 (MST)After looking through their page I see their scoring and they do not have other objectives.
