Difference between revisions of "Talk:XCOM Research"
From benscondo.wiki-rpg.com
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Jeffrey]]: With our doctor out of the equation, I think our resources would be best focused on the chip. Plus it's a lot less likely to suddenly get loose and kill us all. Although I have rewatched the Terminator series just in case. | + | [[Jeffrey]]: With our doctor out of the equation, I think our resources would be best focused on the chip. Plus it's a lot less likely to suddenly get loose and kill us all. Although I have rewatched the Terminator series just in case.<br> |
| + | [[Charles Gordon]]: I agree that the chip should be top priority. I also believe that we do have other doctors on staff, and anything we can learn from that bear anatomy would be very valuable. Given our lack of field medical staff, the last thing we need is to be hit with something we completely do not understand and have no ability to puzzle out on the fly. | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 12 June 2013
Jeffrey: With our doctor out of the equation, I think our resources would be best focused on the chip. Plus it's a lot less likely to suddenly get loose and kill us all. Although I have rewatched the Terminator series just in case.
Charles Gordon: I agree that the chip should be top priority. I also believe that we do have other doctors on staff, and anything we can learn from that bear anatomy would be very valuable. Given our lack of field medical staff, the last thing we need is to be hit with something we completely do not understand and have no ability to puzzle out on the fly.
