Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gemini"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:Matts|Matts]] 18:30, 4 March 2007 (MST)Shenanigans! Barfosaurus Rex! I for one am all for it. | --[[User:Matts|Matts]] 18:30, 4 March 2007 (MST)Shenanigans! Barfosaurus Rex! I for one am all for it. | ||
| − | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 19:43, 4 March 2007 (MST) If only your respectability hadn't been destroyed by all this flip-flopping, I might be interested. I'm afraid I can only support someone who's willing to stay the course, and all these one-shots are nothing but defeatist talk. Count me in anyway. | + | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 19:43, 4 March 2007 (MST) If only your respectability hadn't been destroyed by all this flip-flopping, I might be interested. I'm afraid I can only support someone who's willing to stay the course, and all these one-shots are nothing but defeatist talk. Count me in anyway. I have also cleaned up the main article as it looked like shit. |
Revision as of 20:48, 4 March 2007
--BenofZongo 16:17, 4 March 2007 (MST)At the risk of being called a flip-flopper, back-stabber, and/or barfasaurus rex, I think I'd like to run a Gemini one-shot. This would include one run-through of character/group creation, but probably no ship or gear creation, at least not in any detailed form. The plotline of the one shot would be that the group's ship has been stolen/commandeered/impounded/whatever: the group must recover it during the course of the evening. I presume that the next one or two one shots will probably be exemplar's backstory, but if an opportunity presents itself, I think I would like to do this. If people think it needlessly complicates things, I won't bother.
--Matts 18:30, 4 March 2007 (MST)Shenanigans! Barfosaurus Rex! I for one am all for it.
--Dieter the Bold 19:43, 4 March 2007 (MST) If only your respectability hadn't been destroyed by all this flip-flopping, I might be interested. I'm afraid I can only support someone who's willing to stay the course, and all these one-shots are nothing but defeatist talk. Count me in anyway. I have also cleaned up the main article as it looked like shit.
