Difference between revisions of "Talk:Werewolf Character Guidelines"
From benscondo.wiki-rpg.com
(→General Approval) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
But before I get long winded about it, how close are you to being able to run this game, Gabe? Would you be able to start it up, say after a few sessions of WFRP? Cause I'm sort of itching to play in a game that goes. | But before I get long winded about it, how close are you to being able to run this game, Gabe? Would you be able to start it up, say after a few sessions of WFRP? Cause I'm sort of itching to play in a game that goes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Gdaze|Gdaze]]-- Hmm, I would need to look over the books some. I have the main, bone gnawers tribe and get of fernis books. I could maybe even be ready by next week. If not then, then in two weeks. | ||
Revision as of 17:36, 28 December 2007
General Approval
--Matts 16:19, 28 December 2007 (MST)I'd be down for werewolf. I like the themes you've sketched out. Of the ideas on the table, I think this is probably the best break from the styles of games we've done in the past, in the sense that the PCs are inarguably competent.
But before I get long winded about it, how close are you to being able to run this game, Gabe? Would you be able to start it up, say after a few sessions of WFRP? Cause I'm sort of itching to play in a game that goes.
--Gdaze-- Hmm, I would need to look over the books some. I have the main, bone gnawers tribe and get of fernis books. I could maybe even be ready by next week. If not then, then in two weeks.
