Difference between revisions of "Talk:Exemplars"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:Edmiao|Edmiao]] 23:46, 27 February 2007 (MST) just looked at Gabe's pictures of Hub. Are we going to be supers in tights with costumes? please say "no" | --[[User:Edmiao|Edmiao]] 23:46, 27 February 2007 (MST) just looked at Gabe's pictures of Hub. Are we going to be supers in tights with costumes? please say "no" | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Gdaze|Gdaze]]-- What??? We better look awesome like that! Hahaha! But yeah... actually what are we gonna look like? | ||
Revision as of 01:06, 28 February 2007
Help me out here guys. Im getting bogged down in verbiage. I have these different terms, and I cant decide which one is better and makes the most sense. Some of them need to be stripped away. What Im talking about: Prime, New Man/Woman, Exemplars, next evolutionary step. None jumps out at me, and I cant figure out which lends itself to the smoothest usage. Whenever I get ready to do some writing I end up wrestling over semantics.
--Edmiao 19:24, 25 October 2006 (MDT)Just go with the old X men term: Homo Superior. or Mutie. Depends on what connotation you want. Exemplar has a superior, haughty ring to it. So does Prime. New Human is fairly neutral and gets you away from the Man/Woman thing. How about Homo Nuevo (sounds like a gay latino).
--Jason 21:00, 25 October 2006 (MDT)I need one term that is all sciency, one that you doctor types would make up and use in research papers. Then another one for public consumption, this is where the choice is Exemplar or Prime makes sense. I do like the homo sapiens superioris like the XMen did. Thats why I want a sciency term.
--Edmiao 23:46, 27 February 2007 (MST) just looked at Gabe's pictures of Hub. Are we going to be supers in tights with costumes? please say "no"
--Gdaze-- What??? We better look awesome like that! Hahaha! But yeah... actually what are we gonna look like?
