Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | JASON: Current events has sections, so the extra info would get missed. Old info should be moved to an archive page of the section and a link provided, kind of like how I did the recaps in the [[Deadlands]] page. Its not too important, however, since all old versions of the page are stored in a database and are accessible. I think Matt is only talking about the 'Talk' sections of pages. It makes good sense. | ||
| + | |||
--[[User:Edmiao|Edmiao]] 11:39, 13 May 2008 (MST) how revolutionary. should we do that on the "current events" page as well? | --[[User:Edmiao|Edmiao]] 11:39, 13 May 2008 (MST) how revolutionary. should we do that on the "current events" page as well? | ||
Revision as of 12:54, 13 May 2008
JASON: Current events has sections, so the extra info would get missed. Old info should be moved to an archive page of the section and a link provided, kind of like how I did the recaps in the Deadlands page. Its not too important, however, since all old versions of the page are stored in a database and are accessible. I think Matt is only talking about the 'Talk' sections of pages. It makes good sense.
--Edmiao 11:39, 13 May 2008 (MST) how revolutionary. should we do that on the "current events" page as well?
--Matts 11:20, 13 May 2008 (MST)Hey guys, a proposal: Let's adopt a blog-style editing paradigm for talk pages: put new posts at the top, so that someone following the page doesn't have to scroll down to the bottom past a bunch of shit he's already read, but that stuff can stick around for those who need the whole conversation history.
--Gdaze-- Like this?
