Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 10:41, 14 May 2008 (MST) I declare this format to be an improvement. | ||
| + | |||
--[[User:24.16.98.34|24.16.98.34]] 23:25, 13 May 2008 (MST) This new format is kinda annoying. It makes me read down to up... No culture does that, it is up to down. I veto it. | --[[User:24.16.98.34|24.16.98.34]] 23:25, 13 May 2008 (MST) This new format is kinda annoying. It makes me read down to up... No culture does that, it is up to down. I veto it. | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 14 May 2008
--Dieter the Bold 10:41, 14 May 2008 (MST) I declare this format to be an improvement.
--24.16.98.34 23:25, 13 May 2008 (MST) This new format is kinda annoying. It makes me read down to up... No culture does that, it is up to down. I veto it.
--Edmiao 12:17, 13 May 2008 (MST)no gabe, like this. always on top (that's what your mom said...)
JASON: Current events has sections, so the extra info would get missed. Old info should be moved to an archive page of the section and a link provided, kind of like how I did the recaps in the Deadlands page. Its not too important, however, since all old versions of the page are stored in a database and are accessible. I think Matt is only talking about the 'Talk' sections of pages. It makes good sense.
--Edmiao 11:39, 13 May 2008 (MST) how revolutionary. should we do that on the "current events" page as well?
--Matts 11:20, 13 May 2008 (MST)Hey guys, a proposal: Let's adopt a blog-style editing paradigm for talk pages: put new posts at the top, so that someone following the page doesn't have to scroll down to the bottom past a bunch of shit he's already read, but that stuff can stick around for those who need the whole conversation history.
--Gdaze-- Like this?
