Difference between revisions of "Talk:WHFRP Reboot Recap"

Revision as of 00:53, 2 September 2007

--Dieter the Bold 10:54, 1 September 2007 (MST) So, I'll take complete blame for our current situation. I didn't really put a lot of thought into my responses during the interrogation, or my actions leading up to it. I don't know why I set myself up to be a law-abiding citizen when I'm the opposite, and we're all now in deep-shit because of it. So, sorry for grabbing everyone and dragging them over the rails. Still, huge opportunities here for us all to make things happen.

--Edmiao 12:06, 1 September 2007 (MST) Well, i thought playing a crazy character would be pretty appropriate to the warhammer world, and would fit into a group that was less than law abiding. I mean, they have enitre rule sets and a stat about insanity in the rulebook. there's crazy people in warhammer. with the low fate points and not being all there, i figured he wouldn't last long, but i though more than one session! Anyway, he's now on the run from the law, and since the group seems intent on staying in this town, i guess Elrin will wander into the woods to become an NPC for a while. If you value a combat/stealth oriented character, we could try to work him back in somehow. maybe a lot of bribes?

otherwise i'm making a new character, and i want to make something different, so likely a Charlatan or Innkeeper or Merchant. Does the group have any pereference among these? This may leave us with a distinct lack of combat characters. For Charlatan I was considering Entertainer --> Charlatan (comparing rogue and entertainer, I like all the skills in entertainer vs luck in rogue) or, interestingly, Hedge wizard --> Charlatan. He would have petty magic and then a lot of lying and trickery skills. For those with the sorcery book, are there additional Petty Hedge spells? there's six in the main book, but if i'm to devote a whole career to it with no possible magic advancement it would be nice to have a few more, cus some of the six are worthless (protection from rain? unlucky charm that gives minus one to rolls on a d100??). I think unless there are some additional petty magic spells, then I will go with Entertainer --> Charlatan.

what is the group motive here? we seem pretty goody two shoes to be a smuggling band. now we're commissioned by the watch to solve a murder of a guy who we only knew for a few weeks? how in the world did we go from the idea of a cutthroat smuggling band with no conscience to law abiding citizens that are afraid to cut the throat of a bandit and won't take a minute to loot bodies of fallen victims? what good outlaw leaves perfectly healthy weapons on the ground and doesn't run down and slaughter those who attack them? I'm wondering if i should make a smuggler/liar/cheater or a city watch/noble/law abiding citizen?

--Matts 18:15, 1 September 2007 (MST)I think Ed set this whole situation up for an excuse to put Hi-ho Silver! Away! on the wiki.

I would reccomend a combat character because there aren't any in the group and it's good to keep options open. I'd reccomend more of an urban combat character as that seems to be the way the group is trending and more of how I think I tend to skew my preparation; combat characters in warhammer aren't useless outside of a fight - you've got your Estalian Diestro with his Academic Knowledge science, you've got your Thug with Intimidate and Silent Move.

There's a lot of ground between merciless and insatiable killer and smuggler/liar/cheater. You don't need to push your character's morality all the way to one side or another. I've mentioned it before, but one of the primary themes in this game is "what is worth fighting for". The answer to that question doesn't need to be consistent. In my opinion, it's in the variations and exceptions that a character is found, not in the broad uncompromising stances. It's my intention to challenge your characters' morals whatever they are.

--67.40.199.78 22:18, 1 September 2007 (MST) what's worth fighting for? my horse.

Gabe here: First of all Ed, I think you really need to draw a line between what it is to follow the law and to break it. Just because we smuggle doesn't mean we will whole sale slaughter people. That is just stupid. We are criminals, but that doesn't mean we shout it out from the rooftops. And none of us said we were gonna kill everyone, we said if we NEED to we would kill people. Those guys had run away, so I didn't see any reason to kill them. We had a cart of tons of goods that I would assume would be worth more to us in the long run then some guys' swords.

Personally I think its kinda cheap to saw we are perfectly law abiding citizens. Yes we will smuggle drugs, yes we will smuggle weapons, yes we somtimes may have to bump someone off. But evil does NOT equal just killing whomever looks at you wrong. That is just cartoony evil which we never claimed to be. If we just go around killing without thought there is no way we can continue to do a SNEAKY thing like smuggling. Smuggling is about making contacts, not killing. If you want to kill and loot I would suggest we become bandits.