User talk:BenofZongo

--Edmiao 15:36, 16 April 2008 (MST) deleted old chat.

Do you envision a world where the races are insular, and would not interact, or one where there is diverse trade and cross friendships. i would imagine that the player group would tend to be a mix of races. The idea of buying fat lootz with xp is nice also, one of the problems with dnd was that you find the vorpal blade and only one person can get it. then the other folks are kind of left low on the lootzing. would you allow us to "request" lootz to be incorporated into the sessions? like, hey i'm a theif, i want to spend xp on some boots of sneaking, can the gm help work them into the plot somehow, like on a villain, or would players need to commission them from some magic bootmaker, which would require added money. there's a thought, a big feature of high fantasy is gold, which converts into lootz. would you need both gold and xp to acquire lootz?

I think the roving ship idea with islands sounds interesting, similar genre style to gemini and space opera. Hopefully this time we can make a crew who have similar goals in life. I would suggest not smuggling, since that was the theme of both gemini and wfrp, and that as a group cohesive element seems to be somewhat lacking. I think Iggy is the only one with any interest in smuggling these days.

BEN: I am fairly certain I would not use the ship idea, because of the way gemini went. I would agree to it only if I had some assurance from the players that they would make an actual "crew"...I think for this game, actually, I would have the players meet in an inn, or some other classic gaming trope.
my thought for loot was as follows: for some super bad ass piece of loot, it might be pre-described. But for any other kind of loot, you as the player just describe where it is, or where you found it ("hey look, this mook was wearing some boots of sneaking, and didn't even know it [marks off chunk of xp on character sheet]! Zing, dibs!"). This eliminates the emphasis on looting, but still allows the characters to loot to their heart's content. It also incorporates some cooperative storytelling elements, which y'all know I love. If you have the xp, chances are good that I will allow your expenditure, although super-high powered items will probably have to come from a suitably high powered encounter...haven't thought about limits in this sense yet though.
As for the races, the world will be very classic DnD or whatever in its feel. Nobody is insular, whether racially or politically. Obviously, races/kingdoms have prejudices, but you as a player can go ahead and ignore those with appropriate background. If this turns into a bigger thing, I'll start posting some races: off the top of my head I've got: elves, blood elves, dwarves, wood elves, humans, orcs/goblins (with a persians/samurai feel), were-creatures, treemen/dryads, faeries, golems...possibly some reptilians or other more monstrous creatures as well.

GABE: Haha Ben, you update your page but there is so much I don't know what you did!

I'd like to say I'm very interested in the true high fantasy game. And would vote for it after werewolf finishs up. That said I think the hero system would work best, also, both games we had going would be using the same system. I love high fantasy but I don't like GMing it cuz then I'm not a character.

Also I'd really vote against spending exp on items. I mean why buy an item if I can just spend the points on myself? That way they can't be taken away like a magic item. Personally I think its odd for an enemy to have a magic item and NOT use it (even D&D says this shouldn't be done as villians are not that stupid). It just gives the game a different feel if the characters are allowed to make up items, plus it means the GM has to watch the characters very closely to stop power gaming.

Finding random loot, or any loot, is a major part of the fun for me in fantasy. Making up items is actually fairly easy for Hero anyway. I think exp points should be spent on your dude, not items, as it reflects your improvement. Plus it would slow down the gameplay, now instead of getting items that help you take on harder and harder enemies you have to save up to buy one. Know what I mean?

I made up a LOT of shit for fantasy hero, I mean I have pages, I'd like to show you what I did with them, even have a "level up" system. Also if we do boats, sweet, as I have a crap-load of paper boats from that wiz-kids pirate game. Also, we could use my item cards for the magic lootz.

--Edmiao 13:05, 18 June 2008 (MST) hillarious. gabe, on the "recent changes" page, next to a change, click the "diff" button. then it shows you what is new. then on that page, click the "next difference" button. jason, don't read the above what gabe wrote or your head may explode

GABE: Oh wow, I didn't know you could do that.... sweeeeet. Haha, you mean about the phat lootz?

BEN: I would also like to see the fantasy game become a reality. as for XP on items...its definitely up for discussion. If I used this system, I would probably make it that for "basic", non magic loot, you can make up what people have on them (ie, knives, armor, etc) as long as it doesn't violate what you've seen on them), but for special loot (ie high quality items, magic items, etc) the GM would generate it and then you could only spend points on it if you wanted what was pregened. I agree that finding random shit is more fun, so for anything nifty or cool it would be GM generated.
I would definitely use fantasy hero. I might be interested in some stuff you did, but I am very particular about making up my own game world and systems, so don't be offended if I don't use much of it. Your argument about items isn't completely correct: items will have the OAF and Independent disads, which is a 4x discount compared to if you bought them "on your dude". My main issue is that while lootz and rewards are a major driving factor for some players/characters, avoiding material goods (ie, warrior monks, etc) can be a big part of other characters and I don't think its fair for loot-oriented characters to reap disproportionate rewards from the game world. If you have to pay with points, everybody gets the same amount of benefit. Also, it means that if I have you fight a guy in platemail, I don't have to have a long argument with you about how f-ing hard it would be to a.) get it back into great condition after you've just mauled the dude b.) find someone who would actually buy it c.) that you might get 5-10% of market value d.) how cumbersome it is to lug around, etc, etc. Like I said, improving your dude with equipment is a.) much cheaper and b.) there's some benefits (HKA, RKA, Armor, etc) that you can only get with equipment.
All of that being said, its an experimental idea and I'm not at all set on it. If I didn't use it, I would be enforcing very strict rules on encumberance, trading/selling, etc.
but yeah, I was just thinking about sprucing up this idea because I do really want to run it. I wouldn't have a "leveling up scheme" I don't think. I'm happy to discuss any elements of it.

GABE:

Well first off I just don't allow monks usually, haha. But there are plenty of items to power them up, bracers, boots, vestments, whatever.

Yeah... but why spend exp on something that can be taken away and I could just buy? Even for normal items it seems kinda weird to spend points on. Why should I spend points to make my enemies more difficult just so I can take their stuff when I could just buy the item in a market place? So cheaper exp yes, but the fact that it can be stolen is in my mind, a waste of exp. So I don't think it is so incorrect.

The problems with taking every item is pretty easy to solve. A. is actually the eaisets "It is beyond repair." Bam, not much the character can do there. B. Finding someone to buy platemail shouldn't really be that hard if this is HIGH FANTASY. Adventurers are a type of people and their is a business to supply them. However, whoever does end up buying the armor, say a smith, will most likely buy it for only 1/4 if not less of the value. D. Again, just enforce the rule of weight allowence.

Trying to phase out the character's want of loot and gold will make for a game where the characters will do ANYTHING for gold.

And sure loot guys may get an advantage over the un-loot guys, but the un-loot guys can't be disarmed. And like I said, just get creative with items and is should even out.

I like to think of exp has something I've learned, not an item I just happen to get... Why spend exp for something I can just buy?

My ideas are more about skills and stuff, ways for people to break the 20 stat limit, stuff like that. For examples, a naked power advantage, autofire with HtH killing attacks for a "Fury Attack" sort-a thing. Or another one for warrior type characters is damage resistance, due to whatever reasons they can soak a bit of killing damage.

BEN: I guess I didn't make this clear but...if I used that system, to "buy" items you would have to spend xp on them as well, if you wanted to keep them. any "gold" you got would also be partly represented through xp points. It's clear you don't like this idea, and that's alright. If I don't use this idea, there is a possibility I will use a system other than Hero, although again, I haven't really thought about the nuts and bolts of this game.
Overall, I just thought it would be an interesting way to make characters stick to their "archetype": there's no reason, in this system, for everyone to have identical equipment, to wear a plate helm and no armor anywhere else, to strip every piece of everything off of everybody. But like I said, if you'd rather have the GM do that in other ways, that's fine, and I will lay out what those ways are very early on. I have no intention of restricting loot in any way, I understand that that is one of the major tropes of this genre.

GABE: So we buy everything with exp? Doesn't that mean that the non-loot guys are the only ones who are really improving since everyone else has to blow exp on armor and stuff? Yeah, I guess I wouldn't really be down with that. Just to me exp does not equal gold, so it strikes me as making a heroic style game heroic. I'm also not sure how it would make guys stick to their arch-types... Ah well, we'll see what system is chosen and what everyone thinks!

--Edmiao 14:16, 18 June 2008 (MST)don't really care about the details, but would definitely be interested in a fantasy game.

--Matts 15:43, 18 June 2008 (MST)I'd like a clarification of terms: What exactly does "true high fantasy" mean? Is it a setting? Is it a specific kind of system, with levels and loot and such? Is it a scope?

--Edmiao 16:16, 18 June 2008 (MST) i'm thinking different races of characters (elves, dwarves, kithkin - we're not halflings!, or whatever), plus magic, plus monsters = high fantasy. whether there is loot and levels i don't much care. that's what it is in my head. like wfrp, but instead of having everything special about the world hidden and rare, it is common. but it would be however the gm envisions it.

GABE: For me high fantasy is about lots of differenct races and loads of magic. Also how things use to be better, but have now fallen into ruin. At the same time, the medevial mindset is not quite there. And about finding loot from monsters, not all the time but a part of it. Also that the characters can become legends.

JASON: I think what Gabe is missing here is no one is forcing his character to keep any loot. If the loot costs xp, and he would rather have skills, then take skills and drop the loot. The key to this is it keeps everyone on an even keel. Not to mention that in a high fantasy world the chance of selling dropped armor are much less than in medieval. When money is plentiful, who wants used (and damaged) goods? No one (except the poor, and they pay squat). Heck, in todays world you get less than 1/4 for items (like dvds) that are perfect and no different from new just because they are second hand.

GABE: Eh, but that is just your take on High Fantasy. EXP to me just doesn't represent items. You can argue till your blue in the face. Again, use real world all you want but it is silly when the other subject being compaired is a fantasy world to me. And if you wanted to, it certainly doesn't make sense that I wouldn't keep something. And if I DO keep something, for some reason I don't get better with my ability to use my sword? That doesn't really make sense.

JASON: It isnt my take on high fantasy, its simple economics as taught anywhere. More money and more stuff equals lower prices for used items. You have said that you view XP as a reward, and part of the reward is the stuff you get. What this does is quantify that. You earn x amount of reward, some of it stuff, some of it in other things. What you are asking for is you want an equal reward to what other players get, and stuff on top of that. Ben has already stated that part of the idea is the players get extra xp to account for the stuff. All this is going to do is give some extra xp to the dudes who choose not to take any items.

BEN: well, more than anything, it was meant as a fun mechanic that would eliminate some bookeeping: this way, you wouldn't have to keep track of gear, and gold, and xp, it would all be rolled into one (as long as it was character consistent, etc). But I can see what gabe is saying: part of the fun for some people is having the bookkeeping, having everything separate and assigned in detail. Using xp for everything is essentially a narrativist abstraction to try to force players to RP stuff out and to make what they own as much a part of the character as who they are. It's really a storytelling mechanic: in stories, characters progress sometimes by getting better, and sometimes by getting better stuff. In games where the two are separate, xp is still an abstraction: take WFRP: at the end of one session, all of a sudden you can speak classical. Leveling systems are even more extreme. You kill 1 goblin and all of a sudden you are stronger, tougher, more skilled, etc. This isn't BAD, I'm just highlighting that any and all advancement schemes in games are imperfect abstractions of how a real person or, more importantly, a character in a story, progresses/learns/improves. As jason suggested, in this system characters would get lots of xp, with the assumption being that they would spend some on gear. Also, remember that this system wouldn't make it so you couldn't USE anything without spending XP: you just couldn't keep it. It would be yours, say, until the end of the session, and then if you wanted it longer, you'd have to pay the points. Again, just an abstraction for the fact that someone like Robin hood, for instance, as a character, isn't just a super bad ass who happens to have purchased a bow and a sword, etc, but he IS a dude, a bow, and a sword. (and green tights)
along the same lines, I had an idea that other than dwarves, magical items in this world can "appear" through attunement: that is, items that serve someone well, and that do great things, inherently draw magical power into them. This would explain why, say some great warrior's axe or sword or whatever was magical, just inherently. Also, this would create a mechanic where gear that your character has can get more bad ass over time.
So, yeah. i think, Gabe, that you are thinking about this xp thing very literally, but I understand that taking xp as "learnin' and skillzin'" as opposed to just general "improvin'" is a valid position.