Difference between revisions of "Talk:Plures ex uno"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
--[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 12:23, 27 January 2009 (MST) Still prefer Peregrinus, but since I'm only half-time, put me wherever won't be a gaping hole when I bounce out. | --[[User:Dieterthebold|Dieter the Bold]] 12:23, 27 January 2009 (MST) Still prefer Peregrinus, but since I'm only half-time, put me wherever won't be a gaping hole when I bounce out. | ||
| + | |||
| + | BEN: yeah, I was going to mention that: in all likelihood, you will be part of the attendant/guard contingent, since I can't have story critical characters disappearing 40% of the way through. That's not a guarantee, but it is what is most likely. All of the characters will have important contributions and story related stuff going on, of course. If that's not appealing to you, I understand if you want to bail and just come for the chocolate mousse later. | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 27 January 2009
JASON: I like Lepidus. If we are choosing, thats my first choice.
GABE: I'd be interested in Tullius.
ED: whatever whatever
GABE: Well then...
--Matts 18:04, 9 January 2009 (MST)cast me out of type!
GABE: Actually me too... and would perfer out of type, but down for any.
ED: yes, out of type for me too. or whatever.
--Dieter the Bold 12:23, 27 January 2009 (MST) Still prefer Peregrinus, but since I'm only half-time, put me wherever won't be a gaping hole when I bounce out.
BEN: yeah, I was going to mention that: in all likelihood, you will be part of the attendant/guard contingent, since I can't have story critical characters disappearing 40% of the way through. That's not a guarantee, but it is what is most likely. All of the characters will have important contributions and story related stuff going on, of course. If that's not appealing to you, I understand if you want to bail and just come for the chocolate mousse later.
